Thursday, 18 July 2013

The Future of Music — a ‘musical adda’








 Kolkata’s largest music, movies and books retail chain, hosted The Future of Music—a ‘musical adda’. The panelists were eminent musicians Nondon Bagchi, Jayashree Singh, Bickram Ghosh and a famous representative from the music recording industry, Mahua Lahiri. The interesting ‘adda’ was moderated by Jimmy Tangree, famous radio-personality.

It was largely attended by youth as well as other eminent personalities and general music lovers. At the time when we are all into deep thoughts that whether the physical format is going to exist, all the panelists were very positive that physical format will be there along with the digital format. Music cannot exist only virtually. The excitement  of holding a Vinyl or a Compact Disc, definitely gives us a feel of possessiveness and educate us with every details of the album.






A society cannot exist without music. Music is the best way to express our emotions in all forms. Kolkata mourned with shutting down of Music World but there is also a good news that several other Music Stores are coming up. M3 is opening a store on Park Street & G55 has re-opened under the banner of M3. We want to raise our voice against illegal downloads and request all music lovers to support the industry and pay due respect to our artists, composers, writers, musicians and everyone concerned in creating a masterpiece, which entertains them.

 We invite more such endeavors for creating awareness.

Tuesday, 15 May 2012


A legal update from Asha Audio: Supreme Court upholds the rights of the music companies to charge royalties to Radio Stations playing their music: Asha audio communiqué In a decision dated 3rd May, 2012, a bench of three judges of the Supreme Court overruled a Division Bench order of the Delhi High Court which had held that the Copyright Board had the power to grant interim compulsory licences under Section 31. Therefore this order means Radio Stations in particular (or any broadcasters for that matter) cannot play music without going into negotiation with the Music Companies who actually holds the rights of those music produced. Radio stations have long been attempting to secure interim compulsory licences from the Copyright Board, for sound recordings owned by PPL, SCIL etc. In 2010, recently there has been a case before the Bombay High Court where a radio station had attempted to get an interim CL from the Copyright Board by filing a suit for declaratory judgment before a district court. In that case the Bombay High Court ruled against the radio stations and upheld the decision of the district court that only the Copyright Board could decide matters under Section 31 of the Copyright Act. In the last two years there have been at least two cases before the Delhi High Court, including the present case which was ruled on by the Supreme Court. The reason for radio stations were trying to secure interim compulsory licences is the fact that the Copyright Board can take some time before delivering a final order. In the meanwhile, the radio stations will have to pay out the royalties demanded by music owners. And it has been seen that given the edge of the copyright board there can be a huge difference in the royalties demanded by music owners and the royalties fixed by the Board. In its judgment the Supreme Court disagrees with the Delhi High Court’s conclusion that the Copyright Board could grant interim CL even though the legislation was silent on this aspect. The Delhi High Court had ruled that since the Copyright Board could grant a CL, it would have the implied powers to grant all ancillary and interim reliefs. The Supreme Court however categorically stated that a Copyright Board could not grant interim relief unless the legislation specifically provided the Board with such a power. This will mean that till an amendment in the copyright bill itself comes in effect, the Radio Companies have to pay royalties as needed by the music owners

A legal update from Asha Audio: Supreme Court upholds the rights of the music companies to charge royalties to Radio Stations playing their music: Asha audio communiqué In a decision dated 3rd May, 2012, a bench of three judges of the Supreme Court overruled a Division Bench order of the Delhi High Court which had held that the Copyright Board had the power to grant interim compulsory licences under Section 31. Therefore this order means Radio Stations in particular (or any broadcasters for that matter) cannot play music without going into negotiation with the Music Companies who actually holds the rights of those music produced. Radio stations have long been attempting to secure interim compulsory licences from the Copyright Board, for sound recordings owned by PPL, SCIL etc. In 2010, recently there has been a case before the Bombay High Court where a radio station had attempted to get an interim CL from the Copyright Board by filing a suit for declaratory judgment before a district court. In that case the Bombay High Court ruled against the radio stations and upheld the decision of the district court that only the Copyright Board could decide matters under Section 31 of the Copyright Act. In the last two years there have been at least two cases before the Delhi High Court, including the present case which was ruled on by the Supreme Court. The reason for radio stations were trying to secure interim compulsory licences is the fact that the Copyright Board can take some time before delivering a final order. In the meanwhile, the radio stations will have to pay out the royalties demanded by music owners. And it has been seen that given the edge of the copyright board there can be a huge difference in the royalties demanded by music owners and the royalties fixed by the Board. In its judgment the Supreme Court disagrees with the Delhi High Court’s conclusion that the Copyright Board could grant interim CL even though the legislation was silent on this aspect. The Delhi High Court had ruled that since the Copyright Board could grant a CL, it would have the implied powers to grant all ancillary and interim reliefs. The Supreme Court however categorically stated that a Copyright Board could not grant interim relief unless the legislation specifically provided the Board with such a power. This will mean that till an amendment in the copyright bill itself comes in effect, the Radio Companies have to pay royalties as needed by the music owners
A legal update from Asha Audio:


Supreme Court upholds the rights of the music companies to charge royalties to Radio Stations playing their music:

Asha audio communiqué


In a decision dated 3rd May, 2012, a bench of three judges of the Supreme Court overruled a Division Bench order of the Delhi High Court which had held that the Copyright Board had the power to grant interim compulsory licences under Section 31. Therefore this order means Radio Stations in particular (or any broadcasters for that matter) cannot play music without going into negotiation with the Music Companies who actually holds the rights of those music produced.


Radio stations have long been attempting to secure interim compulsory licences from the Copyright Board, for sound recordings owned by PPL, SCIL etc. In 2010, recently there has been a case before the Bombay High Court where a radio station had attempted to get an interim CL from the Copyright Board by filing a suit for declaratory judgment before a district court. In that case the Bombay High Court ruled against the radio stations and upheld the decision of the district court that only the Copyright Board could decide matters under Section 31 of the Copyright Act. In the last two years there have been at least two cases before the Delhi High Court, including the present case which was ruled on by the Supreme Court. 

The reason for radio stations were trying to secure interim compulsory licences is the fact that the Copyright Board can take some time before delivering a final order. In the meanwhile, the radio stations will have to pay out the royalties demanded by music owners. And it has been seen that given the edge of the copyright board there can be a huge difference in the royalties demanded by music owners and the royalties fixed by the Board.  

In its judgment the Supreme Court disagrees with the Delhi High Court’s conclusion that the Copyright Board could grant interim CL even though the legislation was silent on this aspect. The Delhi High Court had ruled that since the Copyright Board could grant a CL, it would have the implied powers to grant all ancillary and interim reliefs. The Supreme Court however categorically stated that a Copyright Board could not grant interim relief unless the legislation specifically provided the Board with such a power. 

This will mean that till an amendment in the copyright bill itself comes in effect, the Radio Companies have to pay royalties as needed by the music owners
 

Saturday, 23 July 2011

BADO ASHA KORE BY SHAAN

DEAR ALL,

GOLD DISC WAS AWARDED TO SHAAN FOR HIS DEBUT TAGORE ALBUM "KHOLA HAOWA"

KHOLA HAOWA SOLD MORE THAN 50000 CDs.

BADO ASHA KORE ALSO SELLING WELL. IF YOU LIKE TO LISTEN GOOD RABINDRASANGEET THEN PLEASE BUY BOTH THE ALBUMS.

VISIT US AT www.ashaaudio.net

ASHA AUDIO COMPANY